Quantitude

S1E16: Missing Data: (IF EPISODE=16 THEN EPISODE=-999)

In Episode 16 of Quantitude, Patrick and Greg have more fun than is probably socially acceptable when talking about missing data. In addition to embracing the Zen-like paradox of “the presence of missing data,” they also discuss West Point, “is” versus “are,” middle school English teachers, relentless tenacity, talking narwhals, being completely pregnant, taking in

S1E16: Missing Data: (IF EPISODE=16 THEN EPISODE=-999) Read More »

S1E15: Academia and the Chamber of Secrets

Greg and Patrick embark on a free-ranging discussion of many of the things no one bothers to tell you when entering academia, some that were particularly (and often pleasantly) surprising. They also talk about learning to fly, parenting, Richard Russo, Bayesian personality, Craisins, just noticeable differences, crayon giraffes, academic mulligans, final_final_final drafts, dead birds, Britney

S1E15: Academia and the Chamber of Secrets Read More »

S1E13: How Do I Get Scale Scores? Weight, Weight… Don’t Tell Me…

Greg and Patrick pursue several topics raised on prior episodes on scale reliability and measurement invariance to their logical conclusion. Namely, they ponder the multitude of persnickety issues associated with putting a set of items into the psychometric sausage maker to grind out scale scores for use in subsequent analysis. In addition to bickering with

S1E13: How Do I Get Scale Scores? Weight, Weight… Don’t Tell Me… Read More »

S1E12: Measurement (Non)Invariance — Can We Ever Fail to Not Incorrectly Reject It?

In this episode, Patrick and Greg respond to a call-in question that raises a host of issues revolving around measurement invariance testing. In addition to complaining about horrible terminology commonly used in quantitative methodology, they also address pirate mothers, irreverance, time machines, quadruple negatives, buying firewood, digging up bodies, the Schotz clock, and dumpster fires.

S1E12: Measurement (Non)Invariance — Can We Ever Fail to Not Incorrectly Reject It? Read More »

Scroll to Top